Essay on WOMENEssay Writing Service

Essay on WOMENEssay Writing Service Essay on WOMEN Essay on WOMENOnce there were distinctive differences between men and women, their roles in the society and models of behavior. Much has changed since those times. Today, gender roles have shifted essentially influencing societies and civilization on the whole. Women in the Western culture are now no more content with the role of a homemaker; they go out to make their own careers and share the same rights as men. It goes without saying that freedom is more a virtue than a burden; still there are a number of questions arising. Fighting for their rights, the most active women have given birth to a stream of movements and ideologies united under the title of feminism. Today, there is a continuous discourse on the behalf of both opponents and proponents of feminism, but the main thing is to understand the very roots and reasons of the phenomenon. Therefore, this study is intended to find out the objective state of the problem and conclude whether women do win by acquiring the equal stat us with men. For that end, the existing literature covering different perspectives will be analyzed. In particular, the study will focus on protofeminist movements in Europe of the 19the century; passing the Representation of the People Act in 1918; demonstrations on women’s suffrage; women’s efforts during the First World War and the Second World War; the first wave, the second wave and the third wave feminism on the whole. The research is expected to prove that although social reconstruction of sex and gender is not always beneficial neither for women nor for men, the struggle for equal opportunities has become a historically determined stage of social development.The collection of archive video is presented to show how women struggled for emancipation through 1890-1930. This primary source is extremely valuable for a foundational research because it pictures the way women lived at the end of the nineteenth century, and in what way women were expected to be feminine. It is also demonstrated how their lives have been reshaped by the end of 1920s. For example, women with dangerous occupations are shown. This film helps to realize what the thoughts and feelings of women were like at the beginning of emancipation movement.The interview with one of the most thought-provoking and uncompromising feminist theoreticians of the twenty-first century gives an image of the new feminist religion and helps to understand what values and views are spread among feminists today. This primary source deals with sex equality issues, provides legal definitions of sexual harassment, and profoundly criticizes pornography industry as an explicit practice of sex inequality. The information provided by Catherine MacKinnon can be used as an evidence of the realized need for broader horizons for women.The author tries to investigate the relationship between feminist theory and capitalist ideology. A source addressing philosophical perspective is beneficial for a multifacete d research because it provides a useful base to operate with such terms as identity, patriarchy, globalization, and essentialism, often met in the feminist literature. What is more, the book is well-structured, so that it shows how the first, second, and third waves of feminism spanned.The study focuses on the current state of feminism and explains how the so-called third wave began. Although the main attention is paid to the end of the twentieth century and current moment, there is also a deep sight into the genesis of feminity. Generational account of feminism, at the same time, makes it clear for a reader why there are disputes and controversies within the movement.The book deals with an interesting aspect, the relationship between feminist movement and popular culture. It is obvious that today feminism has already penetrated into the mainstream, so the authors try to find out what factors made it possible and what the possible consequences are. The source seems to be even more u seful because it provides alternative view through the analysis of such popular texts as Sex and the City, hip hop culture, Bridget Jones and so on.The source adds much understanding of womanist theory. The author focuses on women’s culture. The source is useful because it places the aspect of womanhood into the context of global problems, including the Civil Rights Movement and nuclear weapons. What is more, it makes the feelings of women clearer, which is important for an objective view.The authors have chosen the relationships between feminism and domesticity as their main subject. The lens they look through is popular culture, mostly reality shows produced in the United States. As popular culture has a serious impact on youth, the study helps to realize the power of feminist ideology today.Judith Worell examines the main contributions made by feminists to the discipline of psychology. Equality and social justice are promoted for all in the different aspects of feminist ps ychology. For example, there is a proposition to develop innovative approaches to therapeutic practice for women. Thus, the information can be used to see the difference between common scholarship and the reflected areas.

Speculation That Edward De Vere Was the Real Shakespeare

Speculation That Edward De Vere Was the Real Shakespeare Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford, was a contemporary of Shakespeare and a patron of the arts. A poet and dramatist in his own right, Edward de Vere has since become the strongest candidate in the Shakespeare authorship debate. Edward de Vere: A Biography De Vere was born in 1550 (14 years before Shakespeare  in Stratford-upon-Avon) and  inherited the title of 17th Earl of Oxford before his teenage years. Despite receiving a privileged education at Queen’s College and Saint John’s College, De Vere found himself in financial dire straights by the early 1580s – which led to Queen Elizabeth granting him an annuity of  £1,000. It is suggested that De Vere  spent the later part of his life producing literary works but disguised his authorship to uphold his reputation in court. Many believe that these manuscripts have since become credited to William Shakespeare. De Vere died in 1604 in Middlesex, 12 years before Shakespeare’s death in Stratford-upon-Avon. Edward de Vere: The Real Shakespeare? Could De Vere really be the author of Shakespeare’s plays? The theory was first proposed by J. Thomas Looney in 1920. Since then the theory has gained momentum and has received support from some high-profile figures including Orson Wells and Sigmund Freud. Although all the evidence is circumstantial, it is none-the-less compelling. The key points in the case for De Vere are as follows: â€Å"Thy countenance shakes spears† is how De Vere was once described in royal court. Could this have been a codified reference to De Vere’s literary activities? In print, Shakespeare’s name appeared as â€Å"Shake-speare.†Many of the plays parallel events from De Vere’s life. In particular, supporters consider Hamlet to be a deeply biographical character.De Vere had the right education and social standing to write in detail about the classics, law, foreign countries, and language. William Shakespeare, a country bumpkin from Stratford-upon-Avon, would simply have been unequipped to write about such things.Some of De Vere’s early poetry appeared in print under his own name. However, this stopped soon after texts were printed under Shakespeare’s name. So,  its been suggested that De Vere took on his pseudonym when Shakespeare’s earliest works were first published: The Rape of Lucrece (1593) and Venus and Adonis (1594). Both poe ms were dedicated to Henry Wriothesley, 3rd Earl of Southampton, who was considering marrying De Vere’s daughter. De Vere was well traveled and spent most of 1575 in Italy. 14 of Shakespeare’s plays have Italian settings.Shakespeare was heavily influenced by Arthur Golding’s translation of Ovids Metamorphoses. There is some evidence to suggest Golding lived in the same household as De Vere at this time. Despite this compelling circumstantial evidence, there is no concrete proof that Edward de Vere was the real author of Shakespeare’s plays. Indeed, it is conventionally accepted that 14 of Shakespeare’s plays were written after 1604 – the year of De Vere’s death. The debate goes on.